Blog Ipsa Loquitur

Some as-yet unidentified burglars broke into an office building and stole a number of computers and monitors once inside. The computers belonged to a non-profit shelter for victims of sexual violence. When the thieves realized it, they returned the computers with an apology note:

“We had no idea what we were takeing. Here your stuff back we hope that you guys can continue to make a difference in peoples live. God bless,”

I can’t decide if this makes them the worst at being thieves, or the best at being people who are also thieves, or what. It definitely makes them pretty bad writers, but it’s heart-warming. Read the whole story, with quotes from the executive director of the nonprofit and the cops.

Published on under The News

So there was already that one juror from the George Zimmerman trial who had never heard of manslaughter, despite being on the jury in a case where she feels the guy holding the gun exercised poor judgment which ended in someone else dying. There was that one.

Another juror from that case, who didn’t want to be identified, appeared on ABC News (giving her first name, age, occupation, how many children she has, her home town, and her current town; as one does when one does not wish to be identified) and this happened:

George Zimmerman got away with murder, but you can’t get away from God.

and then:

When asked by Roberts whether the case should have gone to trial, Maddy said, “I don’t think so.”

If this is who got on the jury, who get kicked off by voir dire?

Published on under The News

The NY Times, on the way kids study for the bar exam these days:

[T]hey took flight to Negril [Jamaica], a coastal resort town, where they rented a three-bedroom house on the beach for $3,000 for six weeks and converted it to Study Command Central. […] The biggest challenge, such as it was, was finding a spot to study on Seven Mile Beach a sufficient distance from the skin-baring revelers at Hedonism II, the famously racy resort nearby.

Hey, look, I’m all for not letting studying for some obnoxious test ruin your life, but maybe let’s not brag to the Times about how you spent your bougie bar summer. Lawyers already have enough image problems, guys. Oh, who am I kidding? It’s like a Russian Dashcam GIF. I can’t look away. Here’s another:

For some, studying from an exotic locale can be a way of overcoming the inevitable sensation of feeling left out of all the fun that everyone else seems to be having.

That paragraph is squeezed in between “bar taker in Thailand beach house” and “bar taker ‘studying’ while playing in World Series of Poker.” Seriously. But really, the important thing here is that you don’t miss out on any fun, guys. Ever. You’re definitely entitled to have as much fun as everyone else all the time. No matter what.

Seriously, studying in a library? In the summer? What are we, peasants?

Published on under The News

The Incidental Economist corrects a story about an Oklahoma medical center which has posted its rates for various procedures online; an earlier version contended that the center could not accept Medicare while posting its prices:

Medicare pays ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) based on an administrative pricing model. ASC rates are generally lower than hospital inpatient rates for the same procedure, which has fueled the huge shift to outpatient and freestanding ASC procedures in the US over the past few decades. The government doesn’t pay the posted rate – they have a fixed price.

A fixed price which is also public, if high. More likely is that the center can’t publicly state that it charges $400 for a procedure and then bill Medicare for $700 for that procedure. Good to know I’m not the only one for whom that Medicare claim raised eyebrows.

Published on under Irreverently Irrelevant

A juror in the George Zimmerman trial, the one who was so quick to hire an agent to land a book deal, did an interview with CNN yesterday. Here, we get some insight into the thought process of the jury in reaching their verdict. From the transcript:

COOPER: Do you think [Zimmerman]’s guilty of something?

JUROR: I think he’s guilty of not using good judgment.

And really, who isn’t guilty of exercising poor judgment once in a while? Oh, if only there were some sort of crime for which we could convict people who exercise poor judgment which results in the death of another. Maybe we could call it involuntary manslaughter and it could be a concept literally thousands of years old. Or something. I’m just spitballing here.

Published on under The News

People are usually pretty surprised to find out that I don’t know a lot of technologically savvy attorneys. In fact, I think most attorneys regard technology the way they regard math — alternately bewildered and indifferent. The following conversation had me cracking up at my desk today:

A: Intern brought in his own computer. It’s a 15” MBP, unibody. It has fucking 10.5.8 He can’t even run Chrome. Get the @#%$# out.

B: How a person’s own gear is set up is a pretty reliable indicator for technical competence, imo.

A: Not doing anything technical for us, just content writing until he goes to law school in the fall…

Published on under Irreverently Irrelevant